Lake Trout EpiGenomics Project

From Methylation & Structural Variation to Candidate Genes — Salvelinus namaycush Ecotypes

Author

Rick Goetz, Sam White, Cristian Gallardo-Escarate, and Steven Roberts

Published

July 14, 2026

Two Ecotypes, One Lake System

Lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) in the Great Lakes occur as divergent ecotypes that share water but not lifestyle:

  • Lean: shallow-water dwelling, elongate body, low lipid content
  • Siscowet: deep-water specialist, robust body, high lipid storage

This project asks a focused question: which genes carry the epigenetic and structural differences between the ecotypes, and what phenotypes might they shape? Earlier stages produced the raw differences — differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and presence–absence variants (PAVs). The work featured here adds the missing interpretive layer: a genome-wide functional annotation that turns coordinates into gene names, products, and Gene Ontology terms, then ranks candidates and reasons — carefully — about phenotype.

302
Differentially methylated regions
3,465
High-confidence siscowet deletions
2,036
Annotated candidate genes
4
Convergent (methylation + PAV)

Read this as hypothesis-generating. Every link below is an association on a single lean-background reference genome — no functional validation, and no single CpG survives genome-wide multiple-testing correction. The value is a ranked, annotated shortlist, not a causal claim.


How the Evidence Stacks: Three Integrated Layers

Differential methylation

  • 540,040 CpG sites tested
  • 302 DMRs (20 hyper- / 282 hypo-methylated in siscowet)
  • 149 DMRs within 5 kb of a gene; 88 in promoters
  • 0 single CpGs survive q < 0.1 — lead with the DMR level

Presence–absence variation (PAV)

  • 3,465 stringent siscowet-specific deletions (>100 bp, all-4-vs-none)
  • 1,543 within 5 kb of a gene; 54 overlap an exon (candidate copy/LOF changes)
  • Reference-bias aware: a lean-background genome inflates siscowet deletions

Functional annotation (new)

  • 46,359 genes annotated from NCBI RefSeq
  • 46,231 with a product description; 34,367 with ≥1 Gene Ontology term
  • The join key that turns variants into interpretable candidates

See analyses/18-annotation/README.md for the annotation methods and provenance.


Convergent & Top-Ranked Candidate Genes

Genes were ranked by convergence (methylation and deletion), promoter/exon placement, expression support, and methylation↔︎expression concordance. The four convergent loci — carrying both a DMR and a high-confidence siscowet deletion — are the strongest candidates.

Gene Product Methylation Deletion Note
znf883-like (LOC120032414) Zinc finger protein 883-like exon · hyper exonic top convergent
XlCGF57.1-like (LOC120040411) Gastrula zinc finger protein XlCGF57.1-like intron · hypo nearby convergent
septin-9-like (LOC120043843) Septin-9-like intron · hyper nearby convergent
LOC120039781 Uncharacterized locus intron · hypo nearby convergent
angptl5 Angiopoietin-related protein 5-like exonic lipid axis
mogat2 2-acylglycerol O-acyltransferase 2-A-like exonic lipid axis
ephx1-like Epoxide hydrolase 1-like promoter lipid / xenobiotic

Top candidate genes bar chart

Top protein-coding candidate genes by integrated rank score. Convergent (methylation + deletion) loci are highlighted; methylation-led and deletion-led candidates are shown by color.

Source: integrated_candidate_genes.tsv.

Gene Ontology enrichment (deletion set)

GO term Fold FDR Read as
Calcium ion transmembrane transport 3.7 5.6×10⁻⁴ most defensible signal
Neuron projection development 2.4 2.6×10⁻³ sensory / neural
Calcium channel complex 4.6 3.0×10⁻³ length-bias caveat
Calcium ion transport 3.0 3.0×10⁻³ ion homeostasis
Lipid / phospholipid binding 1.5 ns (0.3) suggestive only

Hypergeometric over-representation vs. all GO-annotated genes (BH-FDR). The DMR set’s enrichment is dominated by a single histone cluster and adjacent znf883 paralogs — a tandem-cluster artifact, not broad convergence. Full tables: PAV, DMR, union.


Interactive Genome Browsers

Explore methylation, PAV, gene, and ecotype-synteny tracks directly across the SaNama_1.0 assembly. Genes now carry functional annotation (symbol, product, GO terms, and which ecotypes retain them), and lean/siscowet synteny blocks are projected onto the reference so you can see, at any locus, which ecotype contig maps there and whether it is inverted.

🔬 IGV.js — quick exploration

Functionally-annotated genes · lean & siscowet synteny blocks · PAV insertions & deletions · CpG methylation (8 samples) · DMRs

Launch IGV Browser →

🧬 JBrowse 2 — advanced analysis

Functionally-annotated genes (GFF3) · lean & siscowet synteny blocks · PAV structural variants · CpG methylation · differential methylation · lean ↔︎ siscowet Linear Synteny View

Launch JBrowse 2 →

For the side-by-side ecotype comparison, open JBrowse’s Linear synteny view and pick the lean_purged and siscowet_purged assemblies with the Lean ↔︎ Siscowet synteny track.


Interpretation Guardrails

This analysis is deliberately conservative. The constraints below shape every claim above and are baked into the candidate rankings.

The reference is a lean-background genome. SaNama_1.0 was built from a doubled-haploid Seneca Lake (lean-morphotype) fish. Siscowet diverges more from it, so siscowet reads map less completely — inflating apparent siscowet-specific deletions and reducing methylation power in the most divergent regions. Siscowet and lean variant counts are not magnitude-comparable.

No single CpG survives genome-wide correction (0 DMCs at q < 0.1). Interpretation leads with DMR-level and stringent-PAV sets; single-CpG and lenient-PAV hits are hypothesis-generating only.

Expression support is weak by design. The liver RNA-seq is from a separate parasite study with different individuals — orthogonal support, never confirmation.

Enrichment confounders. The PAV GO signal carries a gene-length bias (long calcium/ion-channel genes accumulate deletions by chance); the DMR GO signal is a tandem-cluster artifact. Associations, not causation — no functional validation was performed.


Data & Methods

Reference Genome

Samples

Ecotype Sample Size Description
Lean n=4 Shallow-water ecotype (PacBio HiFi)
Siscowet n=4 Deep-water ecotype (PacBio HiFi)

Analysis Pipeline

  1. PacBio HiFi sequencing with 5mC modification calling
  2. CpG methylation profiling & DMR identification
  3. Coverage/CIGAR-based PAV detection (lenient + stringent tiers)
  4. RefSeq functional annotation backbone (gene → product → GO)
  5. Strand-aware DMR/PAV-to-gene assignment (promoter ±2 kb, flank ±5 kb)
  6. Hypergeometric GO over-representation with BH-FDR

Citation & Resources